It has been clear for years that businesses have dropped ethics in favor of profit. Protecting the bottom line is usually more important than doing the right
thing, even if it means providing a better product to their customers. Companies fear negative publicity, especially if said publicity challenges the security of their
products. It doesn't matter that just about every company and product ships with numerous vulnerabilities, and adding security is a band-aid solution
rather than an integral part of the development life cycle. Rather than work with researchers who are frequently providing what would otherwise be high-dollar
specialized consulting for free, some companies opt to go take the muddy road and pursue legal action against the researchers. This action is one of desperation
and attempts to silence and stifle legitimate research and free speech. Invariably, this ends up being a huge negative PR move, much worse than what
would occur with the publication of said research without the legal murk.
Companies: embrace researchers who are trying to improve the security of your products. Work with them, fix vulnerabilities, and coordinate disclosure. This will go a lot farther toward building customer confidence and help avoid negative publicity.
Researchers: help protect yourself from legal issues. Visit the EFF's Coders' Rights Project. Work with companies and respect their timelines for implementing fixes.
Notes about this page:
The following incidents are not confirmed as legal or financial threats. They are being included here in the hopes that someone will come forward with additional information or clarification.
| When | Company making threat | Researchers | Research Topic | Resolution/Status |
| 2008-08-01 | Apple | Charles Edge / 318 Inc. | FileVault encryption system weaknesses | NDA between Edge/Apple existed already, Apple called Edge on it. Researcher "rescinded talk" but BH CFP team shows no record of talk being submitted in first place.
Attrition Theory: Incident used as press fodder for 318/Edge attention. |
| 2006-12-07 | Oracle Corporation | Argeniss | Week of Oracle Bugs (WoOB) | WoOB cancelled,
rumors of financial/legal threats |
The following incidents are related to the ones above, but "cross the line". They include incidents where it was not "security research", but rather activity that was considered a crime by current laws (at the time). Instead of following a more ethical approach or going the route of responsible disclosure, the researcher chose to research and disclose the details in a manner that was questionable. While the threat of law suit of such activity is frivilous to most, the companies are being prudent because the researcher in question likely did break laws in the process.
| When | Company making threat | Researchers | Research Topic | Resolution/Status |
| 2010-08-23 | n/a | Hari Prasad, Netindia | Voting Machine vulnerability research | Prasad arrested, machine given to him was apparently stolen |
| 2008-09-12 | Carleton University | Mansour Moufid | Used keylogger to expose student information | Moufid charged with computer crime |
| 2006-04-28 | University of Southern California | Eric McCarty | Database programming error allows disclosure of student SSN and more | McCarty charged with computer crime |
| 2003-08-18 | Tornado Development, Inc. | Bret McDanel | Secure Webmail Session Hijacking discovery | Arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 16 months of prison time |
| 2002-03-18 | Harris County District Court | Stefan Puffer | Insecure wireless network discovery | Faces 5 years and $250,000 fine. The
jury deliberated for 15 minutes before acquitting Puffer. |
Over the years, many talks have been cancelled for various reasons. Sometimes, the rumor of legal threats dominate the venue and/or news, but never happened. This table will list such events, to help clarify what happened.
| When | Company making threat | Researchers | Research Topic | Resolution/Status |
| 2010-06-29 | ATM Vendors (unnamed) | Raoul Chiesa | ATM Vulnerabilities | Initial reports said that Chiesa was threatened by ATM vendors and forced to cancel last minute. according to Chiesa, no threats were made. The talk was cancelled for "logistical issues that day". Some in the industry have classified this as a publicity stunt, to garner more attention for the talk at a subsequent date. |
Finally, the Electronic Frontier Foundation maintains a Takedown Hall of Shame that is related to this topic.
Copyright 2008-2011 by Attrition.org. Permission is granted to quote, reprint or redistribute provided the text is not altered, and appropriate credit is given.